Global Economic Policy and the Restoration
of Right Relationships
A Statement of the Religious Working Group on the World Bank and IMF
(Endorsements may be sent to
the RWG at P.O. Box 29132, Washington DC 20017, ogc@maryknoll.org)
Much has been said
in the past few years about the need for a Jubilee.Overwhelming
evidence has pointed to grave deficiencies of the global economy in protecting
the dignity of millions of people and providing for their most basic needs.One
significant expression of this concern has been the global effort to address
the crushing debt burden exacerbating this reality.
But
the moral trajectory of the Jubilee imperative goes way beyond the cancellation
of debt to emphasize the restoration of right relationships among people
(individuals, communities, nations), between human beings and the rest
of creation, and between human beings and God.Our
inability or unwillingness to eradicate poverty or reach basic accord on
how to protect the integrity of creation -- and the ominous specter of
pandemic disease, especially among the most impoverished communities --
compel us as people of faith to probe more deeply the meaning of right
relationship in our own times.While
we have taken a significant first step toward debt cancellation, the pursuit
of right relationships requires that much more be done.
The
continuing existence of the crushing debt burden on poor countries, the
imposition of structural adjustment programs and inappropriate roles played
by the international financial institutions:
·result
in a distorted and broken relationship between the powerful, affluent nations
and the developing countries of the global South. This relationship is
characterized by domination rather than equal respect and mutuality.Creditor
nations and institutions continue to dictate the nature and terms of debt
relief.Theyrequire
poor nations to make far-reaching economic policy changes without the democratic
consent of their people.Indeed,
officials* in creditor countries have openly expressed that they want some
debt burden to remain because it provides leverage for maximizing control
over the economic policies of countries in the global South;
·perpetuate
a distorted relationship with creation – the natural environment.In
order to earn the foreign-exchange needed to make debt service payments,
impoverished countries are forced to pillage their own natural resources
for export to the affluent nations.Structural
adjustment programs harm the environment by placing an undue emphasis on
exports, inducing unemployment and forcing desperate people to try to farm
increasingly marginal land;
·constitute
a moral failing of the wealthy countries and lending institutions, distorting
their relationship with the Creator and Sovereign of nations.The
policy makers and citizens in affluent countries are themselves deeply
injured when they require people living in misery to use for debt repayment
the scarce financial resources that impoverished people need for their
own survival.Their actions have
the effect of denying education to children, health care to entire families,
and limit the resources available to counter the spread of HIV/AIDS in
impoverished countries. The attempt to restructure the economies of other
countries without the approval of their people is an act of hubris that
separates us from the God of love and devastates our neighbors in need.
In
view of these broken relationships, it is not surprising that the debt
burden and the imposition of structural adjustment programs have increased
poverty, inequality and environmental degradation in much of the global
South.
As
religious leaders and people of faith, we are convinced that the restoration
of right relationships with others, creation and the Creator requires ending
the relationship of domination.This
in turn calls for a definitive cancellation of these crushing debts, the
termination of externally-mandated economic policy prescriptions, and a
transformation of the roles of the international financial institutions.We
urge the adoption ofthe following
specific steps:
Cancel the Debt
·Affluent
creditor nations and international financial institutions must immediately
cease accepting debt payments from the poorest countries
·The
international financial institutions, as well as bilateral creditors, must
cancel one hundred percent of the international debts of the poorest countries.
·Beyond
this, creditors should cancel all debts of any developing country which
resulted from illegitimate, unjust loans.Such
loans, for example, are those made during the Cold War period which served
the self-interests of the lenders while failing to benefit ordinary people
in the borrowing countries.
End Structural Adjustment Programs
·Structural
Adjustment Programs as currently constituted must end and macro-economic
policy conditions must cease to be attached to debt cancellation
·Any
economic policy reforms must be chosen through the democratic participation
of the citizens of the reforming countries, with special attention to the
voices of the poor.
Transform the International Financial Institutions
·The
IFIs must cease mandating, recommending or contracting with debtor countries
for economic reform programs that are not developed, adopted and monitored
through fully participatory, transparent and democratic processes, involving
all levels of civil society within the implementing country.
·The
IFIs must make no policy recommendations without prior, publicly available
social and environmental impact assessments.
·Processes,
deliberations, decisions, draft documents and documents of the International
Financial Institutions must be open and accessible to public scrutiny and
accountability.
·The
IMF's gatekeeper role -- in which compliance with IMF programs signals
a country's presumed creditworthiness -- must end.
·Power
within the international financial institutions must be redistributed toward
developing country governments.
As people of faith
with roots and partners in some of the world’s most impoverished communities,
we are aware that these would be but first steps to eradicate poverty and
safeguard the environment. A process of globalization is well underway
about which we are profoundly skeptical. Without significant transformation
of the assumptions, goals and rules shaping the global economy, few, if
any benefits of this process will accrue to the most impoverished countries
and communities.
Time after time we
have witnessed the disastrous impact on marginal communities of decisions
made in distant or disconnected places.We
see this happening once again as people in increasingly centralized positions
of power negotiate global rules for trade and investment that place profit
and growth before human and environmental well-being.
By our faith we are
committed to protecting the dignity of each human life and enhancing the
integrity of creation.In our reflections
on jubilee we have renewed our determination to help make right the unjust
relationships between human beings, societies and the rest of creation.
We will evaluate all policy proposals and decisions in this light.
February 2001